Skip to main content

New Classical School (Rational Expectation Theory)

New classical school (Rational expectation theory)

                 -      Rational expectation theory on quantity theory of money

                 -      Rational version on quantity theory of money

                 -      Radicalist version on quantity theory of money

                 -      Radicalist version on quantity theory of money

                 -      Lucas version on quantity theory of money

The term rational expectation is used in economics only since 1961 by John Muth (American economist) by publishing an article “Rational expectation and price movement”. So, he is also considered as the father of rational expectation revolution.

But, the concept and term “Rational expectation” is widely used, highly developed and made more popular by an American economist Robert Lucas in 1972 by publishing an article called “Expectation and neutrality of money” and award Nobel prize in 1995.
Lucas is also known as the lender of new classical school of economic thought.

The theory says that people are rational and always looking forward for better future. So, the current economic behavior of people is also based on their rational expectations that depends on rational outlook, past experiences, availability of reliable and adequate data and information, (quantitative and qualitative) about the economic variables.

Hence, the theory basically deals with the current role and current effects of rational expectations on the real macro-economic variables in the future. However, the theory is based on given few assumptions:

a) Price and wage rate is perfectly flexible as said by classical school of economic thought

b) All economic agents (consumers, producers, business firm, government, etc) try to maximize utility on the basis of rational expectation

c) There is a unique equilibrium at full employment economy or potential output achieved through the price and wage rate flexibility.

On the basis of given assumptions, the theory says that,

a) Money is neutral at all the time so that the change in money supply affects only on general price level and nominal income but money supply both in short run and long run does not effects on the real output and employments.

b) There is no effect of other policies in an economy i.e. policy in ineffectiveness.

c) There is a tradeoff between price level and nominal income but no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment as in Phillips Curve.

d) Growth of economy is related to the real forces of technological progress, increase in productively of labour, increase in skilled population etc. but not money supply.

e) Market itself adjusts the equilibrium prices.

f) Although the government can help to reduce the rate of unemployment that will also lead to increase price level. So, that the government should not intervene in labour market.

According to the new classical economists, when money supply increases under the expansionary monetary policy, there is only increase in general price level and nominal income but no change in real income, output, employment and real wage rate due to rational expectation. That can be shown with the help of given figures:

Where, the first figure indicates labour market equilibrium, similarly second figure indicates equilibrium position of the economy.

If money supply increases, there is also increase in price level from P5 to P6 with increase in AD1 to AD2. So, the trade union starts decreasing supply of labour for high wage rate by shifting SL1 to SL0.

The result is only increase in price level from P5 to P7 and thereby increase in nominal income i.e. OP7 ×OY5. So, the increase in price level from P5 to P6 is known as demand pull or Keynesian inflation.

And the increase in price level from P6 to P7 is known as cost push inflation.

Again, the movement of equilibrium points of the economy from e1 to e2 and e2 to e3 is known as the cyclical inflation (inflationary cycle).

Hence, according to the rationalists, there is only increase in general price level and nominal income due to increase in money supply but no exchange in real income, output, employment and real wage rate.

However, Radicalists criticizes between Keynesianism and Monetarism but more closer to the views of monetarism so that Radicalists are known as “Keynsman”.

The similarities between Radicalists and Monetarists are like:

a) Both theories developed more or less at the same period about 1971 after the fall down of Keynesianism.

b) Both theories are based on the assumption of classical economists like wage-price flexibility.

c) Both theories concluded that “Money does not matter” in the long run

d) Both theories rejected “Phillip curve” in the long run which is perfectly inelastic or vertical (In long run Phillips curve is dead.)


Popular posts from this blog

Decomposition or sources of high-power money

Decomposition or sources of high-power money (H) with the help of the balance sheet identity of the central bank.
High-power money (H) is the currency (notes, coins) produced by the central bank that consists of the currency (C) held by people in their hands or pockets, total cash reserve (R) of BFIs and other deposits of government, government enterprises and foreign offices (OD) with the central bank. i.e H = C + R + OD It is called high-powered money as on the basis of which all BFIs create money in the form of demand deposits (DD) under the credit creation process (CC). There are many sources of (H) that can be decomposed with the help of the balance sheet identity of the central bank i.e Total assets = Total liabilities             ML + NML = FA + OPA             ML = FA – NML + OPA             ML = FA – (NML - OPA)             ML = FA – NNML Where, ML = Monetary liabilities NML = Non-monetary liabilities OPA = other physical assets FA = Financial assets NNML = Net non-monetary liabilities H …

Neo-Keynesian Approach to Inflation: The Phillips Curve

Neo-Keynesian Approach to Inflation: The Phillips Curve

Generally, Neo-Keynesian macroeconomics has the following four propositions.
i.Private sector is unstable ii.Money in the long run is neutral iii.There exists tradeoff between inflation and unemployment iv.Countercyclical policies are preferable to achieve the macroeconomic stability
Phillips (1958), using the data of Great Britain, innovated the Phillips curve which showed the negative relationship between rate of change in money wage and rate of change in unemployment. The original Phillips curve was just the empirical relationship, however, most influential theoretical interpretation steamed from R.G. Lipsey (1960). The Phillips curve appeared empirically plausible and verifiable explanation of continuously rising money wage, a phenomena which the classical labour market could not explain immediately.
The demand for and supply of labour schedules were assumed to be negative and positive function of money wage respectively. Presence …

Keynesian version on money demand

Keynesian version / Theory on money demand
Definition of money demand
According to J.M. Keynes, money performs both functions of medium of exchange and store in value. Under the medium of exchange, Md (where Md= money demand) is for transaction of various goods and services. Similarly under store in value, Md is for securing purchasing power in the market, to be wealthy in the society, to take precaution in the future rainy days and further income generation by investing it on various financial assets that can easily be converted into cash at any time. Hence, money is demanded by people with three different motives like:           a.Transaction motive (Mdt)… for goods and services           b.Precautionary motive (Mdp)           c.Speculative motive (Mds)… for bills and bonds So, the total money demand (MdT) = (Mdt + Mdp + Mds)
a. Transaction money demand (Mdt)
For consumers it depends upon size of income accumulation of wealth, frequency of receiving income in a given period of time, spending…